SHM-SACD vs Original LP/Original LP-rip, Original CD and other reissues. What you're saying about DACs, i. Super Audio CD (SACD) is an optical disc format for audio storage introduced in 1999. OTOH, there are many recordings from the 60s, 70s, and 80s that are of poor sound quality. I've a Sony XA7ES cd player that has served me well over the years, but even it doesn't get enough play to. Music, Musicians and Bands; Activity. Vinyl. Vinyl. The LP may sound more natural and "warm". Whilst many (recent) multichannel SACDs are more about ambience, others are about using the system to provide an immersive sound (e. I've a Sony XA7ES cd player that has served me well over the years, but even it doesn't get enough play to. Smoother, more open, and slightly fuller than redbook, without the added distortion of vinyl or the oddness in the upper registers heard on SACD. It's rather disingenuous to claim 150 dB dynamic range for CD audio. It also provides a higher bit rate and longer. My DCC is definitly better. Also available on: • UHQR Vinyl Record. Blows them all away with more full body richness. Between vinyl and SACD, I buy SACD. Today I compared it with the 2003 SACD. Quote: Originally posted by kelly jopi The largest problem I have with these subjective opinions is that rarely are both the SACD player and the turntable system of equal quality. The thing that I found most interesting when reviewing the first-time LP record pressing of George Harrison’s 1992 live album — called simply Live In Japan — was not the high quality, dark black, perfectly. . " CD or SACD vs Vinyl. But I do own the original US CD and '93 remaster, along with the vinyl which is a skip-fest sadly. better stereo separation, etc. During the summer I don't get much seat time in front of the stereo so it might be a week or more before my next chance. In other words it needs some work to breath. 1 kHz setup. SACD's can tend to have better mastering and transfer than standard CD releases of the same album. Actually, probably the biggest difference that I have seen with the SACD format. Acoustic Sounds Audiophile Vinyl Records. CD vs. DSD recordings have a wonderful sampling rate and are sensationally good. Acoustic Sounds Audiophile Vinyl Records. Record labels. psulioninks Forum Resident Thread Starter. Every time. SACD can get really close to how good vinyl can sound but not deteriorate so for me SACD wins. meatballz. Would someone out there who has the vinyl and has compared it to either the MFSL CD or the newer SACD please. SACD vs. Not that the SACD doesn't sound really good. The RCA CD of Respighi’s Pines of Rome opens with a wall of sound plastered along the frontal plane of the speakers. 00. BD Pure Audio is basically the same as DVD-A except it's encoded to 96/24. surround sound or multichannel sound). The difference between 24/192 and DSD is that the DSD sounds more analog like, but this is not a huge difference in overall sound quality. The Dark Side of the Moon produced two singles: "Money" and "Us and Them. #20. SACD Players SACD stands for Super Audio CD. Discussion in 'Music Corner' started by fluffskul, Apr 26, 2012. Might as well jump: Mobile Fidelity Sound Lab has announced that Van Halen's first six multi-platinum albums originally released on the Warner Bros. I've not jumped on the SACD bandwagon. Quote: Originally Posted by memepool Isn't it odd then that their full sized machines like the Sony BDP-S1 support a Matsu****a format like DVD but won't play legacy Sony format's like SACD or even redbook. of the Dark Side of the Moon, is NOT good sonically. Todd68, Jun 30, 2019. There are also the hybrid SACD discs from AP but I am not as familiar with those. Have GFTO on SACD and the Yes 1968 - 1987 Studio Boxset on CD. Animals is a concept album, focusing on the social-political conditions of mid-1970s Britain, and was a change from the style of the band's earlier work. I bought 2 each ten years ago or so. One is the MFSL version which I loved. Boy, what a difference. Sony SACD. Australia. Then I bought the new SACD version. This gives vinyl a far more limited soundstage compared to its digital counterpart. 1% $750-$1,000 15 vote(s) 8. Description. e. I've not jumped on the SACD bandwagon. Would someone out there who has the vinyl and has compared it to either the MFSL CD or the newer SACD please. Then I bought the new SACD version. SACD. or Add to Wishlist. I've not jumped on the SACD bandwagon. The title best known is Miles/Blue. By meatballz August 2, 2011 in General Hi-Fi Discussion. The 16/44. Between vinyl and SACD, I buy SACD. If you like SACDs, the 2004 reissue of Relaxin’ by the Miles Davis Quintet sounds equally fantastic, albeit a little different with a brighter high end and more noticeable amounts of tape hiss. Other than that, the DSD bit stream should be exactly the same for the SACD part. Once you listen to the unbelievable sound of the grandfather clock chiming you. Fred Dender and Grampire like this. 49:Personally I am fine with well mastered hi res digital. Then I bought the new SACD version. One is the MFSL version which I loved. I find that SACD offers more detail and a deeper, wider soundstage and better instrument timbre over CD. Virtual Systems Let the world see what you've built. Data read from an SHM CD is no different to the data red from an ordinary CD. 15 on its list of the 20 Greatest Duos of All Time. 112 posts total. Dec 10, 2005. After that, what format is it available in? And which represents the best mastering? It's as simple as that. There are very few times I like the CD better than the LP. I listen mainly to vinyl via a Marantz TT15 Benz Wood SH MC combo. The authors aren’t saying that high-res digital might sound a little different from Red Book CD but is no better. The category "Outstanding" doesn't mean audiophile sound, but outstanding quality compared to original pressings. The difference between DSD and the source vinyl was very, very slight and I am not sure I could tell the difference on any given day. Both formats offer unique qualities that appeal to discerning music enthusiasts, and the choice between them often comes down to personal preference and the pursuit of sonic perfection. Vinyl. Location: Finland. Two channel SACD just blew away the CD's, while hybrids were not out yet I had albums that I had both the CD and the SACD to compare. Then I bought the new SACD version. Merch Rep the community and hobby you love so much. . The difference between DSD and the source vinyl was very, very slight and I am not sure I could tell the difference on any given day. e. The latest in this long history is a double-blind test that, the authors conclude, demonstrates that 44. Tony Plachy, Jan 7, 2015. I have to disagree with the positive remarks of the SACD's. My favourite Mix of Dark Side of the Moon is a Bootleg believe it or not , The Alan Parsons Original Quadrophonic Mix. Hi-res digital audio vs sacd I've got a pretty good setup for vinyl and digital audio files, but I have an opportunity to get a "minty" 10-yr old audiophile-grade CD/SACD player for $350. Look how far CD sound has come in the last 20. 8224 MHz. 24 bit: Best of the bunch. CD was based on limited video tape storage capacity, and also on 1970s computing power. Hopefully this will give you some ability to make a fairly knowledgeable leap to make the album purchase one way or another. DANKOSKY: We'll be talking a bit about some of these new, modern ways of compressing music. These backup copies could be used for future releases whenever a new convenient data medium comes around. #13. It's not exactly chopped liver sonically as I recall, but I will likely go for the MFSL SACD as well, if only to get a nice redbook to boot. I've not jumped on the SACD bandwagon. Sounded most balanced, less bright, more "analog". Like a garage/ alley band. Maybe no better overall than any other version. As noted in my previous post [link], the Forum didn’t want to pay the $. When it comes to listening to music, there are two main formats that audiophiles swear by: SACD players and vinyl. Even if. About 2 years ago, I decided to get back into vinyl. Although the MFSL version is very clear and precise, the SACD version is more expansive and full. Moody Blues "Question of bal. I can go on, but you get the point. Hi commsysman. Like the DVD, SACD was a dual-layer format, but instead of one or two high-density layers, the SACD could have a high-density layer and a CD-compatible layer, so the. Edit; I forgot I have one. Well, I've been thinking of getting into vinyl for a while now but still haven't done it. Location: United States. Limited Edition Numbered SACD CMOB 2260 SA $29. Smoother, more open, and slightly fuller than redbook, without the added distortion of vinyl or the oddness in the upper registers heard on SACD. Which format do you like the most, or find to be the closest to the original master tapes? Or, if you attend live concerts (or play and instrument), whi. The recording/tracking ability of vinyl is easily at least 50 kHz and perhaps as high as 100 kHz. " For classical I prefer SACD due to the format's running time though. I no longer have the capability of playing vinyl. I'm generally rather selective about my SACD purchases and onl. And it was a very close match with the vinyl barely winning the battle. Maybe no better overall than any other version. Doug Sax was also involved with the mastering of these CDs. 4) Making Movies - muted, no drum slam, muted highs. Bluntness acknowledged as you being quite passionate, or convinced that the 20th anniversary SACD version is poor at best It was actually the first SACD I bought many years ago, even without owning an SACD capable player at the time. Joined Mar. For vinyl I currently have the 2009 Classic 200g, I think mastered by Grundman. 98: Grateful Dead / Workingman's Dead Hybrid Stereo SACD Numbered Limited Edition CMOB 2137 SA Original Price: $29. Actually, probably the biggest difference that I have seen with the SACD format. But when I compare the same piece issued both on SACD and vinyl (Channel Records, Pentatone), SACD carries the day by a whisker: a touch airier, a slightly truer tone and yes, an even better “flow” that facilitate following the musical argument. Ironically, the royalty for an SACD was the same as for a CD: $. It was mastered by Bob Ludwig in December 2002. It is a high-resolution digital. Please login or register an accountlogin or register an accountSACD vs CD-do you listen and compare SACD/CD layers on your discs? Discussion in 'Music Corner' started by BSC, Apr 13, 2015. Although the MFSL version is very clear and precise, the SACD version is more expansive and full. Plays in all CD and SACD players. Virtual Systems Let the world see what you've built. . all on Hybrid Multichannel SACD, in a special edition box set limited to 2,500 numbered copies! Also available as 45 RPM double LPs in a box set. The presence of the CD layer shouldn't affect at all (at least in principle) the reading of the SACD layer. The overall DR between the 2 is very close. There's no real difference between the sound characteristics of vinyl, SACD or CD. Redbook back in the day. For vinyl releases, I have this pressing, a MFSL pressing and a late 70's/early 80's US pressing (which is now pretty worn) and I prefer the MFSL version. Then I bought the new SACD version. 1 remixes which I love. but really no. From the sound’s point of view, there is always a difference between SACD and the regular cd, but that left apart, usually XRCDs are sounding much better than. Fred Dender and Grampire like this. Never the SACD player as a SACD player vs a dedicated CD player with the same SACD hybrid disc. 8224 MHz. That leaves Soft Parade which also was released by Audio Fidelity. By Paul Sinclair. Way. SACD Specifications. Luke theorizes that the 2003 SACD and the MFSL were sourced from an LP cutting master and that the original master mixes were used on the Biograph and GHII remasters. So I did. SACD vs. Bonus enjoyment if you have a 5. I still prefer vinyl, but I simply do not listen to CD's any more the digital fatigue compared to the SACD's is just too. IMHO. Not a fair comparison. SACD vs. I listen mainly to vinyl via a Marantz TT15 Benz Wood SH MC combo. " For classical I prefer SACD due to the format's running time though. Given the same mastering, vinyl is still better than redbook. " CD or SACD vs Vinyl. The higher the bitrate, the better the sound quality. This is why CDs sample sound at 44. So, out of sheer desperation, I ordered the standard US CD from Amazon. This music does not sound shrill in the concert hall, and it doesn’t here. The SHM concept is nonsense , its no different to those magic markers that you were supposed to color the edges of your CD's with. Quick links. I listen mainly to vinyl via a Marantz TT15 Benz Wood SH MC combo. I listen mainly to vinyl via a Marantz TT15 Benz Wood SH MC combo. I like both; but am buying more hi-q vinyl than SACD, DVD-A, or HDCD simply because remastered 180g vinyl is easier to find in the genres I listen to: Rock, alt. Would someone out there who has the vinyl and has compared it to either the MFSL CD or the newer SACD please. New posts Search forums. I voted 'Who Cares. That leaves Soft Parade which also was released by Audio Fidelity. I prefer digital (CD, SACD, DVD-A, BDA) but not into streaming - trying to collect the band's material on disc (especially the 70s/80s era stuff). The world's largest high-end audio community. 00. Headquartered in Salina, Kansas, Acoustic Sounds, Inc. "No matter how high a sampling rate is," Wired's. I voted 'Who Cares. SACD vs. I've not jumped on the SACD bandwagon. More sharing options. . Sign in with Google Even the standard redbook CD (44kHz, 16 bit resolution) has about a 26dB advantage to vinyl with respect to dynamic range, and at least a 40-50 dB advantage in stereo separation as well as unmeasurable wow and flutter. comparing your AV receiver's DAC to your CD player's DAC is completely valid. SACD has less expensive equipment than vinyl and it requires a whole lot less fuss to run. I've a Sony XA7ES cd player that has served me well over the years, but even it doesn't get enough play to. Plan9 Mastering Engineer. I've heard to the contrary, that the QUAD version. 1 layer is very good, but the SACD layer has smoother high frequencies (violins, oboe) and better transient attack (tympani). I always remember the SACD being pretty good, but I now think the vinyl destroys it. Kann man diese beiden Formate vergleichen?Analog und Digital? Geht das?Zum abspielen eines SACD Formats benötigt man einen passenden SACD Player. New media New comments Browse Albums Search media. " DeTurk is a big advocate. Likewise whichever has the edge in your playback system will be superior to the. SACD vs. One is the MFSL version which I loved. SACD vs. I did the comparison via my Stax Lambda Pro headphone system (which can be quite revealing). I live near a JVC distributor and have access to many of the titles. I listen mainly to vinyl via a Marantz TT15 Benz Wood SH MC combo. . At current SACD and vinyl reissue prices I sure do. Would someone out there who has the vinyl and has compared it to either the MFSL CD or the newer SACD please. Stereophile SACD test Hi everybody, I've just joined this forum after reading this thread on the Stereophile test. Quick links. Sucks that there's no general concensus as to which CD is better, aside from the SACD. View entire discussion. Yes. Vinyl is better than CD because it reproduces higher frequencies than CD and avoids anti-aliasing filter issues at the frequencies CDs can reproduce. Third - Single side Japanese SACD . A good vinyl record (that is scratch free, been cleaned on a vacume based record cleaner) sounds better then a CD, with again broader, deeper sound field, smoother over all audio, etc. Midrange is sweet. The band did NOT like it at all. Check the numbers; audiophiles have voted decisively with their wallets for vinyl. SACD vs Vinyl Read More » 3) S/T Dire Straits - sounded good, but a bit underwhelming. Packaging: Nicest packaging and faithful reproduction of the original album. Mirror Image, Sep 16, 2022. #4. The newest stuff I have is Pixies, and that's late '80s to early '90s. Gooey black bag houses an extremely high quality record sleeve with postcards, posters, 320 kbps MP3 download and sturdy inner sleeve and a very nice vinyl record in a plastic sleeve. Still waiting form "Brothers in Arms" on SACD I have also ordered the MoFi vinyl releases of: "Love Over Gold", "Dire Straits" and "Brothers in Arms" I look forward to comparing SACD vs Vinyl *reelspin* My thought process is I should buy them while they are relatively new and prices have not reached $200+ each yet. S. While vinyl records, in theory, directly encode a smooth audio wave, CDs sample that audio wave at various points and then collate those samples. I listen mainly to vinyl via a Marantz TT15 Benz Wood SH MC combo. Kevin Gray's work is superior, no matter the format. Thread Tools. A vinyl record vs a SACD is very very close. Endymion, Apr 22, 2015. Claus , Feb 11, 2015 So, my completely subjective vote will go for DVD-A (or SACD). . What do you think about SACD vs Vinyl in sound terms? I know it has been deiscussed but if you feel like answer me now after some years after its. Actually, probably the biggest difference that I have seen with the SACD format. Head Gear. Aug 15, 2012. SACD. The vinyl is top notch too. But I don't have an LP with the exact same mastering as an SACD so I can't do any type of apples-to-apples comparison (and even then equipment comes in to play). Here are my impressions. I've not jumped on the SACD bandwagon. CD has a tint. I don’t care what they claim they did to the CD. Multi. 24. I like SACD as a format, but it's kind of pointless for me when nothing I listen to is on it, and the few things that may peak my interest (i. Id agree with the guy about the old cd and sacd not being *that* much different other than a bit more resolution. Even better than the regular SACD with even clearer presentation. however you need to be extra careful as there are many SACDs where the MultiCh content is not only distinct in being a different mix but a different mastering from the Stereo and that Stereo version can often just be a recycling of the current CD remaster the label had at the. Sent from my LG-H820. I want the best sound. And I'm not all that hot on CDs. I'm generally rather selective about my SACD purchases and only have about 25-30SACD recordings now although I plan to order a lot more as more and more reissues come out. A lot of pops and crackles ("a lot" for a brand new MFSL vinyl, I mean) on the. 2. jupiterboy likes this. This setup would be more flexible and cheaper overall. The MoFi also has surface noise,while the Abkco vinyl is near silent. So far my favorites from each format are as follows: SACD: Eric Clapton - Journeyman DVD-A: Fleetwood Mac - Rumors DVD (Dolby Digital/DTS): Eagles. DANKOSKY: We'll be talking a bit about some of these new, modern ways of compressing music. They are not cheap but not the most expensive of the DCC discs. Consequently, the Super Audio CD (SACD) was developed by Philips and Sony. Limited Edition Numbered SACD CMOB 2260 SA $29. The latest in this long history is a double-blind test that, the authors conclude, demonstrates that 44. The best of both worlds is vinyl ripped on a very high end rig in High res and then converted to DSD. The OP asked specifically if an SHM-Platinum CD sounds better than the redbook layer of a Hybrid-SACD. Seems like for PG3 one should definitely get Classic Records Vinyl, for PG1 SACD gets closer to vinyl, but still the vinyl has upper hand. On September 16th Analogue Productions announced they will reissue the entire ABC/MCA Records Steely Dan catalog on SACD, and 45rpm UHQR LP, beginning November 4th with their debut album Can't Buy A Thrill, now in its 50th anniversary year. Still waiting form "Brothers in Arms" on SACD I have also ordered the MoFi vinyl releases of: "Love Over Gold", "Dire Straits" and "Brothers in Arms" I look forward to comparing SACD vs Vinyl *reelspin* My thought process is I should buy them while they are relatively new and prices have not reached $200+ each yet. Rolling Stone 500 Greatest Albums of All Time — rated 30/500! " Are You Experienced appeared in the U. This is the average EQ of the first track, Tears of Rage. Instrumental and vocal decay became more and more discernible and authentic. Then I bought the new SACD version. I no longer have the capability of playing vinyl. Analog sources- CD vs. The dynamic range of vinyl is about 75dB, CD is 96dB, SACD is 120dB, and the human ear picks up 130dB. I've not jumped on the SACD bandwagon. Blue Note sacds), I already have records of. Details;The 777ES’s performance improved gradually during a burn-in period of three weeks. This is the average EQ of the first track, Tears of. It ain't dead to me at all, thanks in no small part to our host. Thread Status: Not open for further replies. However, I have tested the EQ of my cartridge and phono stage and in all the following examples, that EQ has been reversed out of the vinyl samples so that what we're comparing is the true EQ of what's in the LP groove. Although the MFSL version is very clear and precise, the SACD version is more expansive and full. #2. The vinyl appears to be analogue mastered so if you value an all-analogue chain that would be an advantage. Boy, what a difference. Whether you are just getting started building a classical music collection, or a seasoned collector, there are many ways in which to enjoy the music. After an extensive shoot-out lasting 53 hours, I'm. A lot of pops and crackles ("a lot" for a brand new MFSL vinyl, I mean) on the. Then the sleeves and inner sleeves. Whereas some others where I am pretty familiar with it's vinyl 'equivalent' I could tell even without direct comparison that the vinyl was better, like Kind of Blue for example. Shawn, Dec 8, 2012. I listen mainly to vinyl via a Marantz TT15 Benz Wood SH MC combo. Discussion in 'Music Corner' started by swinger, Mar 2, 2004. One is the MFSL version which I loved. I can't believe there's any real debate over MFSL SACD vs. Vinyl is an analog storage medium, which means there is a physical record of the music imprinted. From the sound’s point of view, there is always a difference between SACD and the regular cd, but that left apart, usually XRCDs are sounding much better than their CD-DA counterparts. The wait is over for the Analogue Productions SACD. SACD VS Vinyl for Jazz and Classical Well, I've been thinking of getting into vinyl for a while now but still haven't done it. SACD is a very nice addition if you maintain a decent stationary rig anyway. SACD. . SACD sounds damn nice, there are LOTS of them available and new SACD's of material that interests me continue to be released. In other words, it sounds like continuous noise on the tape which is mainly audible between the tracks, and MFSL decided not to fade it out. Sign in with Twitter. The 777ES does not perform at its best upon power-on. some of the older quadrophonic recordings now being reissued), or are pieces which were designed for surround sound (e. The Rhino and Audio Fidelity releases are the same mix, but different masterings. It has long been believed that the human ear cannot hear frequencies above 22 kHz. The SACD I found is always better, that’s if you have the right SACD player like the DMP. DJM first pressing vinyl from the UK best of all media. I sampled a bunch of SACDs and kept finding differences that were attributable to different mastering and. 8224. Sex Lies And Master Tapes, Sep 16, 2022. The world's largest online retailer of high-end audio, audiophile music, and accessories. The album features classics such as "Spanish Castle Magic," "Little Wing," "Castles Made Of Sand,". #6. cporcp, Jun 28, 2021 #7. The quantization noise floor for 16-bit digital audio (the CD standard) is -96 dB, each bit yielding 6 dB of headroom between the noise floor and the ceiling. It is a high end format accessible to someone who doesn't want to mess with a protractor, cleaning records or flipping a disc every 20 minutes. So - the SACD ain't the original, but it's a much better option than anything on vinyl except the MoFi vinyl issue. Both vinyl records and Super Audio CDs have. I listen mainly to vinyl via a Marantz TT15 Benz Wood SH MC combo. SACD offers pristine, high-resolution digital audio with exceptional detail, while vinyl provides a warm, analog character and a tactile, nostalgic experience. I've a Sony XA7ES cd player that has served me well over the years, but even it doesn't get enough play to. Hi all, Im searching for some way to test SACD compared to vinyl. One is the MFSL version which I loved. 1/96/192 has little audible effect, ever hear a 20k test tone? The whole resolution. Both are also 4K UHD Blu-Ray players. 99. . Stax, SACD vs. vinyl. Moody Blues "Question of bal. By Paul Sinclair. Jim NBut while we're on the topic of SACD vs. 1:55 - Rotel RC-1570 DAC-In questo video. SACD debate, there is no definitive answer to which format offers the ultimate listening experience. The discs are digitally identical and will sound exactly the same no matter what some snake oil lovers will tell you. All Activity; My Activity Streams . All great stuff and this combined with the revitalized vinyl market bodes well for my enjoyment of music at home and is a much brighter picture than I saw when the future of audio seemed only CD and compressed. Although this recording was digital, the Parsons 2017 remaster actually sounds more analogue than the original cd. So - the SACD ain't the original, but it's a much better option than anything on vinyl except the MoFi vinyl issue. The following are not reviews in any way—nothing I say really matters. Location: West Hollywood, CA and Inverness, IL. $12. 4. Wave 8 Primary equipment used: AKG K1000/ASL AQ-1005 DT/ASL Wave 8/Marantz SA8260 SACD player Stax Classic System II/Music Hall MMF-5 Turntable/Creek OBH-8 (This thread is multiple forum-spanning, I just chose. I'm generally rather selective about my SACD purchases and onl. More 'holographic', deeper staging. Thread Status: Not open for further replies. Would someone out there who has the vinyl and has compared it to either the MFSL CD or the newer SACD please.